Trends in European Grasslands: test-site study
Workflow
energy, carbon and time per run
One point per workflow run that is used, oldest to newest. Hover for values; click to open the run page. Band and bar: mean ± 1 SD of the runs used, or of each group chosen under “Compare by”.
Runs used for mean ± SD:
Cluster
Nodes
Node use
Run by
Compare by
Exclude runs
untick a run in “values per run” below to leave it out
stage mix per run
One column per run, in chronological order, split by each stage's share of the CPU time of all its stages. The four largest stages have their own colour; the rest are grouped. Hover a column for values; click to open the run.
Overview
publications using this workflow item
purpose
- The aim of the workflow was to automate repetitive post-processing steps. The overarching goal of the study was to compare long-term trends calculated for a selection of test sites using a wide selection of input parameters.
FONDA Responsible researcher
- Fabian Lehmann Alumni
- Felix Kummer Graduate Student
- Katarzyna Ewa Lewińska Non-Faculty Academic
application domain
- Remote sensing Application domain
subproject
Run Metadata
workflow runs
Reproducibility
workflow code link
input datasets used
trace types
- Nextflow trace, execution report, timeline, and execution logs
trace data format
- TSV, HTML, and plain text
Execution Environment
workflow engine
- Nextflow Workflow Engine
language
compute cluster
- FONDA Cluster Compute Cluster
backend
- Kubernetes Backend