abstract
- Standardized benchmarks are crucial to ensure a fair comparison of performance across systems. While extremely valuable, these benchmarks all use a setup where the workload is well-defined and known in advance. Unfortunately, this has led to overly-tuning data management systems for particular benchmark workloads such as TPC-H or TPC-C. As a result, benchmarking results frequently do not reflect the behavior of these systems in many real-world settings since workloads often significantly vary from the "known" benchmarking workloads. To address this issue, we present surprise benchmarking, a complementary approach to the current standardized benchmarking where "unknown" queries are exercised during the evaluation.